fws
Specials
David Feldman quoted in Financial Week about reverse mergers on July, 14, 2008.
More>>
March 18, 2009
Securities and Regulation Committee

Association of the Bar of the City of New York
More>>
 
fws
David Feldman's book, Reverse Mergers: Taking a Company Public Without an IPO, now in its third printing, was published in 2006 by Bloomberg Press (available on http://www.amazon.com). View David Feldman's reverse merger blog at www.reversemergerblog.com.
fws
Joseph Smith and David Feldman are coauthors of PIPES: Revised and Updated Edition - A Guide to Private Investments in Public Equity (Bloomberg Press, 2005) available on http://www.amazon.com.
 
SEC Asked for Guidance on Trading Restriction for Former Shells
PIPEWire (July 01, 2008)
Securities attorney David Feldman is asking the Securities and Exchange Commission to provide guidance on what he calls the "scarlet letter" for shell companies that was introduced in recent changes to Rule 144 of the Securities Act.

Feldman, partner at Feldman Weinstein & Smith, told PIPEwire that he has submitted a request for interpretive guidance from the SEC on the section 144(i) of the rule change.

Changes to Rule 144, which governs when a holder of restricted securities is allowed to freely trade them, took effect Feb.15. Section 144(i) states that if a company was ever once a shell company, and is not current with its financial filings, then its restricted securities can never be freely traded.

PIPE investors have said that the restriction discourages them from investing in companies that are former shells.

The SEC may not have intended to make the rule retroactive, Feldman said. The commission may issue guidance saying the rule does not apply to companies that ceased to be a shell prior to Feb. 15.

A group of attorneys – Brett Director of Schulte Roth & Zabel, Michael Maline of Goodwin Proctor, and Carol McGee of Alston & Bird – spoke about the subject during a recent online seminar. They agreed that having the rule not be retroactive would be preferable to the current interpretation of the rule, but that an immediate change is unlikely.

"Ultimately this will be changed I think, whether its six months or three years I'm not sure," said Feldman.

fws

Disclaimer: The information on this site does not convey legal advice of any kind. The transmission of this web site or communication with Feldman Weinstein & Smith via Internet e-mail does not by itself constitute or create an attorney-client relationship between Feldman Weinstein & Smith and any party. Any information sent to Feldman Weinstein & Smith via Internet e-mail or through this web site is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis.
Attorney advertising is contained on this website.
©2008 Feldman Weinstein & Smith LLP