fws
Specials
David Feldman quoted in Financial Week about reverse mergers on July, 14, 2008.
More>>
March 18, 2009
Securities and Regulation Committee

Association of the Bar of the City of New York
More>>
 
fws
David Feldman's book, Reverse Mergers: Taking a Company Public Without an IPO, now in its third printing, was published in 2006 by Bloomberg Press (available on http://www.amazon.com). View David Feldman's reverse merger blog at www.reversemergerblog.com.
fws
Joseph Smith and David Feldman are coauthors of PIPES: Revised and Updated Edition - A Guide to Private Investments in Public Equity (Bloomberg Press, 2005) available on http://www.amazon.com.
 
David Feldman is quoted in an article on "virgin shells" in The Reverse Merger Report for second quarter 2006.
The Reverse Merger Report Second Quarter 2006 Virgin Shells Cleaner, Cheaper, Better?
Executives from investment banks including Rodman & Renshaw, Westpark Capital, and Spencer Trask Ventures are increasingly creating Form 10-SB shell companies, also known as "virgin shells," as a vehicle for taking private companies public.

The first of the recent reverse merger transactions involving virgin shells are being completed with concurrent private placements in the $30 million to $50 million range.

Filings of 10-SB forms for new, non-trading shell companies have become a common occurrence at the SEC in recent months. Several dozen virgin shells have been set up this year at an initial cost of about $25,000 each, to cover accounting, legal, and regulatory fees.

Another $25,000 is likely needed to take the shell through the merger process and get it publicly traded, industry watchers say.

Investment bank-led enterprises are behind a large percentage of these deals. They are setting up several shells at once, at a fraction of what it would cost them to buy an existing shell that already trades.

Only a handful of these shells have found merger partners this year. With some of those, investment banks kept small ownership stakes of less than 2% in the companies their shells merged with.

Rodman & Renshaw has seen members of its executive team create five separate virgin shells this year, under the name of R&R Acquisition. The strategy is a new one for Rodman, although the New York-based investment bank was already active in the reverse merger market. Rodman was the lead underwriter for several SPACs in the past year, which have raised close to $500 million.

The first of the new R&R shell companies agreed on March 31 to merge with staffing company Global Employment Solutions. R&R founders retained a stake of 1.7% in the newly merged company. The deal was completed along with a $30 million private placement with Rodman & Renshaw acting as the placement agent.

Others, including Los Angeles-based Westpark Capital, have sold their entire stakes in their shell companies at the time of their mergers. The going rate for flipping these virgin shells now appears to be around $200,000. That price is well below what some publicly trading shells have gone for in the past year - often more than $300,000 and in some cases $1 million, plus retention of as much as 10% equity in the surviving company. Still, virgin shell sale prices offer sizeable profits for a $25,000 to $50,000 investment made just a few months earlier.

Many reverse merger specialists say these profits are not justified and contend that virgin shells do little except reduce the time involved should a private company choose to do a self-filing to become public.

Cheap Way to Register Shares

A virgin shell company is created when a newly incorporated blank check firm with only a handful of officers and directors voluntarily subjects itself to SEC reporting requirements by filing a Form 10-SB, issues initial shares for a nominal price, and files audited financial statements.

Within two months of its filing, and with an initial investment as small as $20,000, a shell company's registration statement can be filed and declared effective. The shell can then be used to merge with another private company, with the intention of taking the merged company public. Stock of the shell company cannot trade prior to a merger.

These types of shells are seen as advantageous to other reverse merger vehicles because of their cost, the speed and simplicity with which they can be formed, and, perhaps most importantly, the easy approvals they have received from the SEC.

Dozens of 10-SB shells have sailed through the SEC registration process with few or no comments from the commission. Meanwhile, more complicated Rule 419 blank checks and SPACs have met much stiffer resistance and taken many months to get approved, according to David Feldman, a partner at law firm Feldman Weinstein, who has worked on many of the 10-SB filings this year.

The Form 10-SB shells may escape more critical scrutiny from the SEC because they are formed without public offerings, and because they honestly disclose their status as shell companies, Feldman said.


Prices Still In Flux

Like existing public shells, the potential exists for 10-SB shells to be sold off to other parties interested in a reverse merger. Feldman said that a typical sale price is around $200,000 for a 99% interest in the shell company. It remains to be seen what, if any, reaction the Securities and Exchange Commission might have to flipping these manufactured shells. Westpark Capital's most recent sale of a Form 10-SB shell bears that out. Westpark's president and chief financial officer created five separate virgin shells last August, under the name "SRKP." (Another three SRKP shell companies were formed earlier by Westpark, but they used an initial SB-2 filing, rather than a 10-SB.) Common stock was registered for a consideration of $25,000 for each of the companies.

The first and only one of the five Westpark-related 10-SB shells to merge thus far was SRKP 4, in a deal reached in late February. The transaction is with oncology drug developer Cougar Biotechnology.

The Cougar-SRKP merger deal called for Westpark's shareholders to sell their entire stake in the shell company for $200,000, minus legal and accounting fees that Cougar incurred as part of the merger. Filings indicate those professional fees totaled about $60,000.

Cougar officials announced on April 10 that the merger transaction closed, along with a $47.7 million private placement led by Adage Capital Management. No SEC filings have been made regarding the private placement; it is unclear whether Westpark acted as an agent in the transaction or received additional payments for its work in the merger.

For some investment banks, the lure of virgin shells apparently has less to do with their value than with the opportunity they can provide to give a company the banks are already working with access to public markets. Some of these banks already have a stake in the company they are using the shell vehicle to merge with. Also, these firms expect to receive equity and fees from the private placements that go along with the reverse merger.

That was the case in the first Rodman & Renshaw reverse merger completed this year. In the R&R Acquisiton reverse merger with Colorado-based staffing firm Global Employment, 98.4% of the shell company's original shares were exchanged, with the founders of the shell retaining the remaining ownership.

The deal was reached on March 31, less than three months after R&R's initial Form 10-SB was filed with the SEC. The company intends to trade on the OTC Bulletin Board.

Rodman & Renshaw received an additional 2% of the merged company's shares, as payment for acting as the placement agent for the concurrent $30 million private placement.

R&R Acquisition 1 officers invested $25,000 to purchase two million unregistered shares of the company when it was first incorporated in February 2005. Similar investments were made for the other four R&R Acquisition 10-SB shells that were set up at the same time. None of the other four shells have announced merger deals.

Among other investment and venture capital firms taking an interest in virgin shells, New York's Spencer Trask Ventures has seen its executives set up three companies under the "Adagio Acquisition" name. Each company was formed in late 2005, with an initial investment of $50,000 each. None of the three has announced a merger yet.

fws

Disclaimer: The information on this site does not convey legal advice of any kind. The transmission of this web site or communication with Feldman Weinstein & Smith via Internet e-mail does not by itself constitute or create an attorney-client relationship between Feldman Weinstein & Smith and any party. Any information sent to Feldman Weinstein & Smith via Internet e-mail or through this web site is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis.
Attorney advertising is contained on this website.
©2008 Feldman Weinstein & Smith LLP