fws
Specials
David Feldman quoted in Financial Week about reverse mergers on July, 14, 2008.
More>>
March 18, 2009
Securities and Regulation Committee

Association of the Bar of the City of New York
More>>
 
fws
David Feldman's book, Reverse Mergers: Taking a Company Public Without an IPO, now in its third printing, was published in 2006 by Bloomberg Press (available on http://www.amazon.com). View David Feldman's reverse merger blog at www.reversemergerblog.com.
fws
Joseph Smith and David Feldman are coauthors of PIPES: Revised and Updated Edition - A Guide to Private Investments in Public Equity (Bloomberg Press, 2005) available on http://www.amazon.com.
 
Joseph Smith referenced in an article concerning new SEC rule regarding hedge fund registration. The PIPEs Report, May 1, 2005.
Registration Uncertainty: Many PIPE Fund Managers Delay Decision
by Joe Gose
The deadline requiring qualifying hedge fund investment managers to register as investment advisers with the Securities and Exchange Commission is seven months away, and many PIPE fund managers have yet to determine their course of action. Several managers are just now beginning to explore the new rule, which essentially amends the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 to include hedge funds that for years have been exempt for registration. Many other managers aren't likely to consider the matter until summer.

Given the fact the many PIPE fund managers will meet the three-pronged test that requires registrationan investment pool of 15 or more individual clients, $25 million or more in assets under management, and a lockup period of two years or lessindustry observers expect the majority of managers to register.

While failing to meet any of those three thresholds would automatically exempt a manager from registration, fund managers seeking to avoid registration are focusing on two approaches. The first is to simply employ a two-year lockup period beginning February 1, 2006, which is the deadline for registration.

But managers of funds that have closed by that date can avoid registration as well, even if the funds have a lockup test to funds who add limited partners after February 1-or to funds that launch after that date. That gives fund managers a loophole to consider. "I don't think the SEC would like to hear the word 'loophole'," says Robert Minion, a partner with Lowenstein Sandler, "but certainly it's an end-run around the rule."

The two-year lockup provision stems from a couple of goals the SEC had when crafting the final rule, Minion says. The commission first wanted to exclude private equity and venture capital funds, which typically lack the liquidity, exit strategies and mark-to-market valuations that hedge funds possess. Thus, the SEC arrived at a two-year lockup because most hedge funds typically prevent investors from redeeming their fund shares for 12 to 18 months.

But the SEC also exempted existing arrangements between hedge fund managers and their investors from the rule, which effectively exempts closed fund managers from registration. If such a fund with less than a two-year lockup took advantage of the loophole, but then opened back up after February and received new investors, the manager would then have to register.

" For PIPE fund managers, the so-called end-run may be the only strategy available to avoid registration. But the fact that most PIPE funds are relatively young and operate in a niche space may hinder a manager's ability to close a fund by next February. Those same characteristics also make it harder to convince clients to accept a two-year lockup. "This was a very aggressively debated rule, and it's possible that the SEC staff thought only the largest with the best known managers were going to have the kind of cache to require a two-year lockup," Minion says. "PIPEs are a much newer brand of manager, and they don't have the cushion and luxury of past performance and earnings to say, It's a two-year lockup. Take it or leave it.'"

Differing Strategies

Mitch Levine, found and managing partner of Enable Capital Management, illustrates the point. He often has considered a longer lockup period than the 18 months he now requires. "I just have one little issue," he muses. "my limited partners are not willing to do that." So far this year, enable Capital has invested some $3.7 million in 15 PIPEs, according to PrivateRaise, which tracks issuances of more than $1 million.

Levine says Enable Capital will register, and last August it hired Conifer Securities in San Francisco as administrator to perform several services, including record keeping, communicating with limited partners, accounting and compliance. Conifer also is assisting with the registration process. Levine adds that he was a meticulous record keeper before the push for registration reached a full steam last summer. "To me, it wasn't a hard decision for a hassle," he says of registration. "I've been in this business long enough to know that record keeping is critical and that everything must be done appropriately, because there are always people sniffing around."

Mitch Hull, managing director of Hull Capital Management, manager of a PIPE fund of funds, says the investment managers with whom he invests are still undecided about whether to register. Meanwhile, Hull himself has yet to closely study the registration issue, saying that he intends to scrutinize it this summer. But he suggests that plenty of PIPE funds managers will have the option to avoid registration. "The decision is really going to be based upon whether PIPE funds are closing or not," he says, "and I think most will be closed long before the deadline."

Hatteras Investment Partners, a multistrategy fund of funds manager that recently invested with Hull Capital, decided to beat the rush and registered in January. "We felt like it was inevitable for the government agencies to kick in," says Josh Parrott, director of risk management for Hatteras, "so we just went ahead and registered."

But other PIPE experts are observing a generally languid response from investment managers to the prospect of registration. Only two fund manager clients have notified Joseph Smith, a partner with Feldman Weinstein, about their plans, and both are opting out of registration: One has fewer than 15 investors, and the other has a two-year lockup period. Those funds are probably atypical to the overall PIPE fund space, he adds. Eleazer Klien, a partner with Schulte, Roth & Zabel, reports that its still unclear what direction his clients are leaning.

Bristol Capital Advisors met with its administrations during the last week of April to discuss registration, but Paul Kessler, principal of the firm, didn't anticipate making a decision in the immediate future. "Obviously it's a big question, but we're totally on the fence," says Kessler, whose firm has made 17 placements, valued at $11.6 million so far this year.

Further Changes?

An outside shot that the rule could be amended or even dropped, particularly given the SEC's contentious 3-2 vote in favor of the rule last July, is likely fostering hope  and some of the hesitancy  among investment managers. Lobbying efforts to change the rule are still underway, and new commission appointments and speculation about whether Commission chairman William Donaldson will remain to see his initiatives implemented also are muddying the picture.

Additionally, Opportunity Partners late last year filed a complaint against the SEC in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., and in the appellate court of that district, claiming that the Commission had overstepped its authority when it finalized the hedge fund registration rule. In April, Opportunity Partners fund manager Phillip Goldstein filed a 56-page brief with the court outlining his claims that the SEC isn't authorized to reinterpret the Advisers Act's definition of "investor" which is at the heart of the new registration rule. The SEC is expected to respond this month.

Changes that investment managers would find unwelcome may occur, too, especially if a large number of fund managers opt for the two-year lockup to avoid registration. If the SEC suspects abuse, Minion says, it could amend the registration rule to eliminate the two-year lockup test and look instead to the holdings of a fund's portfolio, for example. On the other hand, the commission could determine that it has provided enough protection to investors with the current rules, he adds, and that it's "buyer beware" for investors who put money into funds with two-year lockups.

Behind-the-scenes wrangling notwithstanding, the general consensus is that the SEC will push ahead and enforce the rule. Minion's prediction: managers of some 50% of all hedge funds will automatically register  and would have registered regardless of the rule. Of the remaining 50%, about 25% to 30% of conventional hedge fund managers will register, and 35% to 40% of PIPE fund managers will register. "It's not surprising that people are just getting around the thinking about it," he says. "But the clock is ticking, and the calendar's moving. It's getting close."

fws

Disclaimer: The information on this site does not convey legal advice of any kind. The transmission of this web site or communication with Feldman Weinstein & Smith via Internet e-mail does not by itself constitute or create an attorney-client relationship between Feldman Weinstein & Smith and any party. Any information sent to Feldman Weinstein & Smith via Internet e-mail or through this web site is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis.
Attorney advertising is contained on this website.
©2008 Feldman Weinstein & Smith LLP